abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
ADEWCHGTIPKUSXOFVLYRBZJMNQ
Why did some tech companies soar during the past decade, 2000 through 2009, while others floundered? The winners--Apple, Google and Salesforce.com, for instance--had the foresight to invent new, profitable sectors (digital media devices and services, Internet advertising, software-as-a-service). The less fortunate--AOL, Dell and Sun, for instance--got distracted or guessed wrong on major trends. Here's our take on the decade's winners and losers in technology.It's easy to fawn over Apple. Let's not. Apple's products aren't cheap. Its employees are secretive about upcoming products. And Apple has done a terrible job of communicating the health status of rock star Chief Executive Steve Jobs, who took a mysterious six-month leave of absence last January only to resurface with a liver transplant in June. None of that, however, really matters. Over the past 10 years Apple's stock has risen more than 650%. Its employee head count rose to 32,000 last year from 8,568 in September of 2000. Apple routinely tops the PC category of the American Customer Satisfaction Index. Finally, Jobs' absence proved he has built a team that can deliver good results--if not detailed updates about his health
JTN WIW YOSC RCET EOSFAXICY YOAL WBLIXG RTC FAYR WCEAWC, 2000 RTLOBGT 2009, JTIUC ORTCLY HUOBXWCLCW? RTC JIXXCLY--AFFUC, GOOGUC AXW YAUCYHOLEC.EOS, HOL IXYRAXEC--TAW RTC HOLCYIGTR RO IXZCXR XCJ, FLOHIRADUC YCEROLY (WIGIRAU SCWIA WCZIECY AXW YCLZIECY, IXRCLXCR AWZCLRIYIXG, YOHRJALC-AY-A-YCLZIEC). RTC UCYY HOLRBXARC--AOU, WCUU AXW YBX, HOL IXYRAXEC--GOR WIYRLAERCW OL GBCYYCW JLOXG OX SAPOL RLCXWY. TCLC'Y OBL RAKC OX RTC WCEAWC'Y JIXXCLY AXW UOYCLY IX RCETXOUOGN.IR'Y CAYN RO HAJX OZCL AFFUC. UCR'Y XOR. AFFUC'Y FLOWBERY ALCX'R ETCAF. IRY CSFUONCCY ALC YCELCRIZC ADOBR BFEOSIXG FLOWBERY. AXW AFFUC TAY WOXC A RCLLIDUC POD OH EOSSBXIEARIXG RTC TCAURT YRARBY OH LOEK YRAL ETICH CMCEBRIZC YRCZC PODY, JTO ROOK A SNYRCLIOBY YIM-SOXRT UCAZC OH ADYCXEC UAYR PAXBALN OXUN RO LCYBLHAEC JIRT A UIZCL RLAXYFUAXR IX PBXC. XOXC OH RTAR, TOJCZCL, LCAUUN SARRCLY. OZCL RTC FAYR 10 NCALY AFFUC'Y YROEK TAY LIYCX SOLC RTAX 650%. IRY CSFUONCC TCAW EOBXR LOYC RO 32,000 UAYR NCAL HLOS 8,568 IX YCFRCSDCL OH 2000. AFFUC LOBRIXCUN ROFY RTC FE EARCGOLN OH RTC ASCLIEAX EBYROSCL YARIYHAERIOX IXWCM. HIXAUUN, PODY' ADYCXEC FLOZCW TC TAY DBIUR A RCAS RTAR EAX WCUIZCL GOOW LCYBURY--IH XOR WCRAIUCW BFWARCY ADOBR TIY TCAURT
This table shows the occurances of the letters in the text (ignoring the case of the letters):
This table shows how the text matches a normal probability to text (where 'E' has the highest level of occurance and 'Z' has the least). The grey rows show what would be expected for the order, and the red one shows what your text gives for the order: